Michael Powell on Net Neutrality

Former FCC Chairman Powell keynoting a conference yesterday:

“I’m getting where I want to on the Net, with no problems — and there would be problems if I couldn’t get to Google,” Powell said. “What’s really going on here [in the public debate] is a battle between the Googles and Verizons of the world — it’s a big scrum about who should absorb the full costs [of running the network]. From the consumer side, it’s going pretty well — they are getting fairly inexpensive access to high speed broadband, and Google keeps innovating with cool stuff.”

Like I have said before, Net neutrality is a battle between big telco and big media.

None

1 Response to “Michael Powell on Net Neutrality”


  1. 1 NJ Feb 21st, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    Andrew, do you think it would work?

    From my perspective there are a few scenarios:

    Scenario 1:
    Verizon would do this.
    Google/Yahoo/MS etc, would not pay.
    Customers would blame every slow website on Verizon throttling (even when it isn’t) and leave in droves.
    Executive responsible would fall on his sword ala SonyMusic & DRM.

    Scenario 2:
    Verizon would do this.
    Google/Yahoo/MSN etc. don’t pay
    Verizon degrades their service to force them.
    Tortuous interference in business lawsuits follow & customer class action suits.
    Verizon pays out fortune
    Executive responsible would fall on his sword ala SonyMusic & DRM.

    Scenario 3:
    Verizon would do this.
    One of Google/Yahoo/MSN pays.
    Verizon prioritorizes their connection.
    Nobody notices because difference is too small to be worthwhile.
    … other variations on this theme.

    Scenario 4:
    Verizon would do this.
    All of Google/Yahoo/MSN pay.
    Verizon prioritorizes ALL their connection having zero net effect.
    All other websites extremely slow (the long tail), customers leave in droves….
    … other variations on this theme.

    I just don’t see why any website would pay (scenario 3). I can see a train crash coming, or a really big train crash coming, but no scenario that results in Verizon having more money.
    How much is download a video 10 seconds faster worth to a Verizon customer? If that’s worthwhile then why can’t Verizon charge that to their customers, if it isn’t, what makes them think anyone else will pay?

Leave a Reply





This website incorporates no offer, nor solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any security or investment.

DISCLAIMER

Nyquist Capital is powered by WordPress 2.0.5, K2 and 3 Column K2
RSS Entries and RSS Comments