Infinera files S-1

Infinera filed an S-1 today, the link is here.

First impressions? I’m not surprised that the company isn’t generating an operating profit. But I am a bit shocked that their cost of goods sold is higher than their revenue. I need to spend more than 5 minutes looking at the S-1 but this one fact jumped out immediately.

3 Responses to “Infinera files S-1”


  1. 1 Herb Chen Feb 26th, 2007 at 9:47 pm

    I would love to read your analysis on this one. I haven’t spent a lot of time on the S-1, but it reads like nothing I’ve quite seen before.

  2. 2 colin w Feb 27th, 2007 at 9:29 am

    It probably takes a good couple of hours to make any sense of this S-1 but there looks to be some very unusual revenue recognition policy at work. They claim invoiced revenue of $140m for 2006 of which $53m is recognisable in the year and the rest is upgrade packs, software upgrades and services such as training. It is difficult to see how they can sell this much training so they are either invoicing for substantial future software upgrades or they are selling systems that are expanded over time as a package, all of which sounds very challenging. In addition they are running a massive GM loss on declared revenue which must mean giving the base system away, AND they have the interesting concept of deferred inventory costs…

    I look forward to your analysis….

    Having just been through the S1 filling process the SEC is going to have quite a few questions for Infinera so don’t expect a listing any time soon.

  3. 3 Frank Feb 28th, 2007 at 1:02 am

    Walk through the S-1 numbers for 2006:
    VC $110M round last July,
    605 employees
    $58.7M Revenue
    $(89.1M)=$(14.55/share)losses
    Single major customer
    Cash bal. 29.7M
    Obviously IPO is driven by cash for survival.

Leave a Reply





This website incorporates no offer, nor solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any security or investment.

DISCLAIMER

Nyquist Capital is powered by WordPress 2.0.7, K2 and 3 Column K2
RSS Entries and RSS Comments